Electric
Scooters: Where Do We Stand?
Author:
Alison Kelly, Landscape Architect
|
Electric-powered scooters have become a familiar
sight throughout the State of California and the
country at large. Dotting street corners in tidy
rows in the mornings, placed haphazardly outside
office buildings after the lunch hour, and
zipping down streets and sidewalks at all hours
of the day, electric scooters are fast becoming
a ubiquitous feature of the urban
landscape. The rapid expansion of electric
scooters has drawn both support and criticism.
By understanding the pros and cons of electric
scooters and various regulatory considerations,
landscape architects, urban planners, and cities
can capitalize on this significant example of
private investment in the public
realm.
The potential
benefits of incorporating electric scooters into
a city’s transit infrastructure are
substantial. Leading electric scooter
companies, such as Bird and Lime, tout their
products as an alternative non-vehicular means
of transportation, a zero-emission people-moving
mechanism that can reduce short distance
single-occupant car trips.
Commuters who use public transportation for the
bulk of their commute and who cannot or do not
wish to ride a bike to travel the final distance
to the office can avoid a taxi or ride share
trip by hopping on a nearby electric
scooter. As many scooter riders will tell
you, electric scooters also have the benefit of
being fun to ride. Tourists are a major
subset of electric scooter riders, as they enjoy
seeing a new city at a leisurely pace without
breaking a sweat.
|
Renting an
electric scooter for a ride isn’t quite as
simple as hopping on and zipping
off. Riders must first download each
company’s app using a smartphone. The app
shows locations of nearby scooters that are
currently unoccupied and ready to be checked
out. Typically, scooters are placed in neat
rows first thing in the morning, after being
charged overnight. Later in the day,
scooters may be distributed in more irregular
groups as they are ridden and parked in various
places by the riders. First-time users of
an app also need to enter a credit card for
payment (entered one time then used for all
subsequent purchases, similar to the way the
Uber and Lyft apps work), and a photo of a
driver’s license to verify age. Critics have
noted these requirements do limit use across the
socioeconomic spectrum; Washington D.C. is
hoping to develop a method for cash payment.
(1)
Rides are priced by the minute, timed from
check-out to check-in using the app. Some apps
also require that users take a photo of the
scooter where it is stopped at the end of the
ride to record potentially illegal parking
practices. Riders can expect to pay a typical
fee of $1.00 to unlock the scooter, plus $0.15
per minute.
Electric
scooters may have famously started in
California, but 2018 saw the trend spread across
the country and throughout the world. With such
exponential growth, many cities have multiple
competing brands of scooters within the same
geographic area. The City of Austin, Texas has
had such high rates of usage that scooter
providers have needed to schedule mid-day
servicing of their fleets to charge the
scooters’ batteries. The usefulness of scooters
in urban settings and the potential to replace
short car trips has drawn enormous investment to
electric scooter companies. Ford recently
purchased Spin for nearly $100 million, while
Uber has partnered with Lime.
(2)
The first of
many regulatory challenges comes with the way a
scooter company chooses to launch a fleet in a
new city. Several companies initially gained the
industry a reputation of “begging for
forgiveness rather than first asking for
permission” after launching electric scooter
fleets without consulting city officials. This
prompted San Francisco to temporarily ban all
electric scooters, eventually offering two
permits to electric scooter companies Skip and
Scoot. Other cities issue permits to a certain
number of total electric scooters, split among
different providers.
(
2)
Supposing an
electric scooter company does approach a city
first to request permission to operate locally,
how might a city respond? Some jurisdictions
might be glad for the private investment in
public transit and permit operation without
caveats. Others, hesitant of the demands
electric scooters place upon the public right of
way, may take a different approach - as did New
York City, when, considering the density of
sidewalks and bicycle lanes without scooters,
issued a firm “thanks, no thanks” to scooter
companies. State regulations may also play a
role in whether electric scooters must operate
on city streets, sidewalks, or not at
all.
- California:
State regulations prohibit riding an electric
scooter on the sidewalk, or on roadways with
speed limits in excess of 35 miles per hour.(3)
- Colorado:
State and local regulations classify electric
scooters as “toy vehicles” which must be ridden
on the sidewalk, and are prohibited from
operating on the roadway or bike path.(4)
- Wisconsin: A
State regulation classifies electric scooters as
motor vehicles, therefore requiring individual
vehicle registration with the State.(5)
| |
To address
safety concerns, electric scooter companies
require that all riders wear helmets and meet a
minimum age requirement. These requirements are
frequently violated by users, as are regulations
requiring scooters be ridden on the sidewalk,
roadway, or in a bike lane. Conflicts between
pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles, and scooters
are difficult to avoid without formally set and
well-understood rules for where and how a
scooter should operate. One particularly active
period of reported scooter accidents in Austin,
Texas, led the Federal Center for Disease
Control (CDC) to partner with the City of Austin
to understand the most common source of
incidents.
(6)
This study is currently underway, but the
City of Austin is already planning to put a safe
riding ordinance into effect by spring of
2019.
Moreover,
electric scooter companies are beginning to put
money and effort toward improving the safety of
scooter riders. Bird recently announced plans to
form a Global Safety Advisory Board, led by the
former head of the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, with the goal of
improving electric scooter safety.
(7) Bird
has also proposed a funding strategy whereby
$1.00 daily per vehicle in a city’s fleet would
be dedicated to a fund for improving bicycle
lanes and infrastructure in that city. Bird
currently offers cities data on usage within
their geographic area, which can be a valuable
metric in understanding the flow of people
through the city. This data can also be used for
post-occupancy analysis or in scoping a site
pre-development.
Electric
scooters have great possibility to replace
vehicular use, particularly single-occupant,
short-distance car trips in congested urban
environments. At the same time, city management
and planning authorities must carefully weigh
the risks to public safety before approving
electric scooter programs for operation. With
clear rules and robust public awareness
campaigns to ensure all users understand the
rules for legal operation; scooters may safely
co-exist with existing users of the public right
of way. Electric scooters are here to stay, and
cities have the opportunity and challenge of
establishing a safe framework in which citizens
and visitors can utilize the full benefits of
this technology.
About
the Author
Alison
Kennedy, PLA, LEED AP ND, is a Landscape
Architect with O’Dell Engineering. She is
the Co-Chair of the ASLA Women in Landscape
Architecture PPN and Chair of the ASLA Archives
& Collections
Committee.
| |
Media
Update -
Earlimart Park Honored
|
| | |
Funding Opportunity - Due 2/13/19
Prop
68: Cultural, Community, and Natural Resources
Grant Program
|
California
voters passed the California Drought, Water,
Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor
Access for All Act of 2018 (Proposition 68) on
June 5, 2018. Proposition 68 authorized the
Legislature to appropriate $37 million to the
California Natural Resources Agency (the
“State”) for competitive grants that protect,
restore, and enhance California’s cultural,
community and natural resources. This resulted
in the Cultural, Community and Natural Resources
(“CCNR”) Grant Program. It is the intent of the
people of California that projects funded by
Proposition 68, including the CCNR Grant
Program, result in public benefits addressing
the most critical statewide needs and priorities
for public funding. For additional information
on this and other funding opportunities, please
visit our
Resource Center.
| | | |
Project
Update -
Clovis Dog Park Master Plan
|
O’Dell
Engineering is working closely with the City of
Clovis to develop a Dog Park Master
Plan. This Master Plan will tie into the
City’s Parks Master Plan to provide guidelines,
best practices, and recommendations for the
development of municipal dog parks in the
City. O’Dell identified existing parks
suitable for development of the first three dog
parks and has developed concept plans, budgets,
timelines, and water use estimates for each site
as part of the Dog Park Master Plan. The
project is currently at 90% development, with a
public meeting scheduled for January 23
rd
. To
learn more about this project, please
visit our blog.
| | | |
| | | | |